It is certain that we have seen posts in social media about the perceptible fatigue of teachers in the forefront of on-site lesson delivery. In the Basic Education and High School level we have seen and heard cases of which teachers are literally and figuratively dying and most of them are verbalizing their complaints on the readily available social media.

There are reputable and trustworthy websites who had looked into these realities and they are looking into the cases with magnifying lenses and they are not militant groups.

This link https://www.nea.org/advocating-for-change/new-from-nea/survey-alarming-number-educators-may-soon-leave-profession, is a US based website and the banner story on this website and still up today reads ; A staggering 55 percent of educators are thinking about leaving the profession earlier than they had planned, according to a National Education Association (NEA) survey of its members released on Tuesday. This represents a significant increase from 37 percent in August and is true for educators regardless of age or years teaching, driving buses, or serving meals to students. However, the poll found that a disproportionate percentage of Black (62%) and Hispanic/Latino (59%) educators, already underrepresented in the teaching profession, were looking toward the exits. (Tim Walker February 2022).

In the Philippines we have seen how teachers are saddled with Administrative Works and how these dynamics had created sad realities for the physical and mental states of the overworked teachers.

In Leyte National High School ,the biggest enrollees totaling more than ten thousand on site students, it is true. The Junior and Senior High School, teachers are subjected to the constant crowding and heat. With Class size of more than 30 students with two shifts per week, the teachers are tired and it is not an over statement. They have to simultaneously conduct these classes at two shifts per week and do the administrative tasks all at the same time. These realities need no citation nor quote to support the claim, it is a personal knowledge and this phenomenon is observable every single day.

It’s not only the teachers which are on the tight grip of these drowning learning reality, the students too. They too, are going through a very tough time emotionally. The teachers in spite of her shackles of physical and mental pressures that drains her persona, he or she has the unique position to augment and assist students at risk of mental breakdown.

Perhaps, it would not be written as a sort of statistics but the teachers have prevented suicides and that only the students can validate this. But surely, they had prevented many of those. The students can also lessen the burden of their teachers by the interactions they have with them. The inspiration and sense of fulfillment they have for the students who are doing good.

In all the school is also a real consultation room where the interaction of the teacher and the students can lighten the burdens of each other. These symbiotic interdependence is galvanized in stone. The idea that both these segments of our educational players needs help is old news. Old news or not they need institutionalized assistance, now more than ever. They need our help and understanding.

WE have to understand this point very well. We need to be truly poor so we can be truly rich in God, attaining the fullness of our dignity as God’s image and likeness, children of his, sharers of his divine life and nature. This is how we can be truly rich.

To be truly poor is to acknowledge that we depend on God for everything. To be truly poor is not about how much one has or does not have. That is a very poor description of what is to be truly poor. And that’s because one can have a lot of things and yet know that everything comes from God and is for God and for everybody else.

A truly poor person knows that he is not the absolute owner of whatever he has, even if he is entitled to the right of private ownership. He is at best only a steward tasked to make use of whatever he has to start building the kingdom of God here on earth. A truly poor person has an abiding awareness that he is only a caretaker of the goods of the earth and that he is answerable to God and to everyone for that duty.

In a certain sense, our earthly life can be described as a matter of emptying and filling. That is, emptying of our own selves, our own egos, so we can be filled with God, with love, which is what is proper to us.

In whatever we do, let’s see to it that this business of emptying and filling is the underlying law and principle that is being followed. Failing in that can only mean failing in our ultimate purpose in life, no matter how successful we may appear to be in our work or social and political life, and in the other aspects of life.

We need to adapt and develop the relevant attitude and skills so we can turn this ideal into a working lifestyle. We should not forget that Christ clearly said: ‘If anyone wishes to come after Me, he must deny himself, and take up his cross and follow Me.” (Mt 16,24) That, in a nutshell, is the biblical basis for this business of emptying and filling.

Christ himself, our way, truth and life, lived this principle perfectly by emptying himself so he can be filled with the will of his Father.

St. Paul expressed this fact in this way: “Christ who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form he humbled himself and became obedient unto death, even death on a cross.” (Phil 2,5-8)

Christ’s self-emptying cannot be overemphasized. Being the son of God with whom nothing is impossible, he chose to be born poor in a manger and led an austere life all throughout. Even in his impressive moments of preaching and making miracles, he did not want to be treated as a king or some kind of celebrity.

He preached about meekness and humility and lived what he preached. “Learn from me for I am meek and humble of heart,” he said. (Mt 11,29) In the Last Supper, he shocked his apostles when he began to wash their feet and insisted on doing so, despite the protestation of Peter, to give an example for them to follow.

We need to be truly poor to be truly rich in God!

Many of us have, at some point in our lives, contemplated becoming entrepreneurs. What a good inclination! But sadly, only a few of us are patient enough to sit down first and study the pros and cons of engaging in business, thus resulting in our limited grasp of entrepreneurship.

These blurry notions about business enterprise show when we get confronted with vital questions regarding entrepreneurship. We can’t even be sure of our answers. In my case, for instance, I can only express limited concepts without certainty on whether I’m giving the right answers or not.

As to the question of whether one should start from scratch for one to be called an entrepreneur, I can say on one hand that, yes, one should start his business from scratch so that he can monitor how it progresses over time. But I also don’t think so, because the best way to start a business is to have sufficient capital first since being an entrepreneur means having the capacity to start and run a business.

What if one simply buys a business venture, or inherits it from parents, can that person be considered an entrepreneur? Well, I figure that a person who merely inherits a business is not a real entrepreneur. But I also have the feeling that to be an entrepreneur means being into business, whether the latter is pioneered or simply inherited.
Should someone hire workers or employees for him to be called an entrepreneur? My layman’s grasp is that entrepreneurship is more about investing in the business, even if no workers get hired. But I’m also of the opinion that one cannot attend to his business alone; he needs workers to help him with the nitty-gritty of the business.
How about if one simply delegates the management of his business to someone else, is he an entrepreneur? My guess is that, yes, an entrepreneur or investor may not run his business himself. But it’s not ideal entrepreneurship if he simply assigns somebody to run and operate his business.

What about engaging in a franchise business, is it entrepreneurship? For me, franchising is not entrepreneurship in the real sense of the word. That’s parasitism. You just rely on a fully established business and allow yourself to be instrumental in its branching out operations. There is no originality in it, seemingly.

So, is entrepreneurship determined by what one does or think in a business company? I think entrepreneurship does not depend on what one thinks; it depends on what one does. Even if one thinks he is doing an entrepreneurial exercise, if he does not put it into action, he will not qualify as an entrepreneur.

Can someone, who owns no business enterprise, be called an entrepreneur? That’s foolishness to think of. How can one be called an entrepreneur when he owns no business at all? Well, ask no more questions about this topic. My ignorance of it is just showing further, spreading far and wide.