Due to budget deadlock

TACLOBAN CITY — More than 500 job order (JO) workers of the Borongan City government were abruptly ordered to stop reporting for work on Friday, January 30, after the city failed to operate under an approved 2026 budget, triggering confusion among affected workers and drawing sharp criticism from members of the City Council.
Acting Mayor Emmanuel Tiu Sonco issued a memorandum directing all JO workers to cease reporting to their respective offices, citing the lack of legislative authority to continue or enter into job order contracts while the city government is operating under a reenacted budget.
In his memorandum, Sonco pointed to the City Council’s failure to pass the proposed P1.6-billion city budget for 2026 as the reason for the suspension of JO services.
“The Sanggunian Panlungsod did not approve the request of the Executive seeking authority to hire job order personnel under the reenacted budget, thereby leaving the city government without the necessary legislative authority to continue or enter into job order contracts,” the acting mayor said.
The directive reportedly caught many JO workers off guard and also sparked criticism from several members of the City Council, who said the budget deliberations were still ongoing.
A councilor, who requested anonymity, said the decision was unexpected, noting that the proposed budget had not been rejected but was still under active discussion.
“Considering that the proposed P1.6-billion budget is still being deliberated, the acting mayor could have sought authority from the council instead of issuing a memorandum that effectively terminated the services of job order workers,” the councilor said in an online interview.
The councilor explained that Borongan City is currently operating under a reenacted 2025 budget amounting to more than P1.1 billion, as the proposed 2026 budget was submitted to the council only on December 23, the last working day of 2025.
“Although we were able to initially tackle the proposed budget on that day, its size required careful scrutiny. Formal deliberations resumed on January 6, and we are now nearing the completion of the discussions,” the councilor said.
According to the council member, the city government had previously operated under reenacted budgets without suspending the services of JO workers, who continued working and were paid retroactively once the new budget was approved.
“There was no termination order then. To me, this appears to be grandstanding on the part of the acting city mayor,” the councilor added.
The City Council is expected to complete deliberations on the proposed 2026 budget by February, with the budget’s effectivity also anticipated within the same month.
The councilor said the fate of the affected JO workers would ultimately depend on whether the acting mayor would rehire them once the new budget takes effect.
JOEY A. GABIETA






