A teacher was said to have yelled to prevent a boy from punching another student, and was recorded, spread all over the web, and reported to the police for “psychological abuse.” A mother in another town who slapped her teen for shoplifting money was threatened with prosecution for child abuse. That is the new normal: discipline is criminalized, and those willing to bring a child to order risk going to jail.

We live in an era when disciplining a child—particularly with tough love—is under suspicion. In a bid to swing away from child abuse, the pendulum has swung too far and deposed every type of conventional discipline. Teachers now flit nervously in front of misbehaving children, fearing the cellphone camera eye. Parents also walk around their children, wondering what will be the welcome mat to the knock on the door by a social worker, a scolding, or a pat on the back. We’ve made them unattainable in the interest of protection, but are we making them unreachable as well?

Discipline is not abuse. Discipline is a framework. Discipline is responsibility. Discipline is love in its grungiest, least glamorous incarnation. Kids, particularly when they’re young, push the limits. And if there is no regular punishing of ill manners, the limits dissolve and disappear. What we see now—these bratty kids who yell back, skip school, and have full-blown tantrums in shopping malls—is not liberty. It is the mess sown by the lack of discipline. Without censure, there can be no betterment.

There is sanity in the old practices, even if open minds disdain them. The slap on the hand, the time-out, the removal of electronics—these are not displays of brutality, but of concern. They say, “You can’t do that and do it with impunity.” But in the world today, even a tut-tutting eyebrow may be deemed trauma-inducing. We have pampered children into frailty, unaware that we are teaching them to snap at the first resistance life offers in their direction.

What is more deplorable is that most of those who would be quick to report instances of punishment do little when the same child turns hostile, reckless, or violent later in life. They blame the school, blame the parents, blame the community—but where were they when the child had to learn “no”? Yes, children do have the right to be safeguarded. But they have a right to be educated, too. Safety isn’t pampering. And discipline, meted out in love and purpose, is a gift, not a tool of exploitation.

Teachers, quasi-parents in the old days, are now suspected of something. They no longer stretch out on the limb emotionally or ethically for students for fear of crossing vaguely defined boundaries. Parents are being taken from themselves as well by intruders who feel they know better. And while this is happening, children are learning that consequences are at the discretion of anyone and authority is a joke. What are we creating as adults when we are afraid to correct the children we love?

The threat isn’t in the bedrooms and classrooms—it’s in our laws and policies that indiscriminately criminalize. One-size-fits-all policies, supposing all discipline is evil, close their eyes to cultural wisdom and parental instinct. Parental love needn’t be reduced to cruelty, but correction needn’t be ruled out as well. Or we’ll have an allergy to correction and an addiction to entitlement spreading across a generation.

If there is a way out, it has to be back towards balance. Let us safeguard children, yes—but not by removing from us the means to bring them up well. Let discipline be recognized once more, not as brutality, but as love teaching, molding, and settling the young. We cannot bring up responsible adults by treating them like precious dolls these days. Love has to be tough sometimes. Love has to say no sometimes.

Determining the appropriate percentage of business income an entrepreneur should receive is a complex issue with no one-size-fits-all answer. The ideal percentage depends on several factors, including the business structure, stage of development, investment levels, risk tolerance, and the entrepreneur’s role and responsibilities. This article explores the key considerations in determining a fair and sustainable compensation strategy for entrepreneurs.

1. Business Structure and Legal Considerations: Setting the Foundation for Compensation
The legal structure of the business significantly impacts how income is distributed. Different structures have different implications for taxation, liability, and ownership:

– Sole Proprietorship: In a sole proprietorship, the entrepreneur receives all the profits but also bears all the liabilities. The entire income is considered personal income and taxed accordingly. The entrepreneur’s share is 100%, but this also means they bear 100% of the risk.

– Partnership: Partnership profits are distributed as stipulated in the partnership agreement. This agreement should clearly define each partner’s contribution, responsibilities, and share of profits. The percentage can vary widely depending on the agreement.

– Limited Liability Company (LLC): LLCs offer some liability protection while allowing flexibility in profit distribution. The operating agreement should specify how profits are allocated among members.

– Corporation (S Corp or C Corp): Corporations have a more complex structure, with profits distributed as salaries, dividends, or retained earnings. The entrepreneur’s share depends on their salary, ownership stake, and the corporation’s profitability. Tax implications are significant and require professional advice.

Legal Counsel: Seeking legal counsel is crucial to ensure the chosen business structure aligns with the entrepreneur’s goals and complies with all relevant regulations. The legal structure directly impacts how income is taxed and distributed.

2. Stage of Business Development: Balancing Risk and Reward

The stage of business development significantly influences the entrepreneur’s appropriate income percentage. Early-stage ventures often require significant investment with uncertain returns. As the business matures and becomes more profitable, the entrepreneur’s share might adjust:

– Seed Stage: In the seed stage, the entrepreneur might take a minimal salary, reinvesting most profits back into the business for growth. Their focus is on building the foundation and proving the business model. A small percentage of income, or even no salary, might be common.

– Startup Stage: During the startup phase, the entrepreneur might take a modest salary, prioritizing reinvestment while gradually increasing their share as revenue grows. The balance shifts towards a higher percentage as the business becomes more stable.

– Growth Stage: In the growth stage, the business is generating consistent revenue, and the entrepreneur’s compensation can increase significantly, reflecting their contribution and the reduced risk. A higher percentage of income becomes more feasible.

– Mature Stage: In a mature business, the entrepreneur’s compensation might be a combination of salary, bonuses, and a share of profits, reflecting their ongoing role and the business’s profitability. The percentage might stabilize or even decrease if the business is highly profitable and the entrepreneur’s role is less hands-on.

Financial Projections: Developing realistic financial projections is crucial for determining a sustainable compensation strategy. This helps balance the entrepreneur’s needs with the business’s financial health.

3. Investment Levels and Risk Tolerance: Considering External Funding and Equity
The level of investment, both personal and external, influences the entrepreneur’s share of income. Investors typically expect a return on their investment, which affects the entrepreneur’s ultimate share:

– Bootstrapped Businesses: In bootstrapped businesses (funded solely by the entrepreneur), the entrepreneur retains a larger share of profits. However, this also means bearing all the financial risk.

– Venture Capital-Backed Businesses: Venture capitalists typically receive equity in exchange for their investment. This reduces the entrepreneur’s ownership stake and consequently, their share of profits. Investment terms are subject to negotiation and differ greatly depending on the investment amount and the company’s development stage.

– Angel Investors: Similar to venture capitalists, angel investors receive equity in exchange for their investment, impacting the entrepreneur’s share of profits.

Equity vs. Debt: Understanding the difference between equity and debt financing is crucial. Equity financing dilutes ownership, while debt financing requires repayment. The entrepreneur’s share is directly affected by the type of financing secured.

4. Role and Responsibilities: Fair Compensation for Contribution

The entrepreneur’s role and responsibilities within the business should be considered when determining their share of income. A founder who is actively involved in daily operations might receive a larger share than a passive investor.

– Active vs. Passive Role: Entrepreneurs with active roles, managing day-to-day operations and strategic decisions, typically receive a larger share of income. Passive investors, who provide capital but are not actively involved in management, might receive a smaller share.

– Specialized Skills: Entrepreneurs with specialized skills or expertise that are crucial to the business’s success might negotiate a larger share of income.

– Market Value: The entrepreneur’s market value, based on their experience and skills, can also influence their compensation.

5. Regular Review and Adjustment: Adapting to Changing Circumstances

The entrepreneur’s share of income should not be static. It should be reviewed and adjusted periodically to reflect the business’s performance, the entrepreneur’s contributions, and changes in the market.

– Performance-Based Compensation: Incorporating performance-based bonuses or incentives can align the entrepreneur’s interests with the business’s success.

– Market Benchmarking: Comparing the entrepreneur’s compensation to industry benchmarks can help ensure fairness and competitiveness.

In conclusion, determining the appropriate percentage of business income for an entrepreneur is a multifaceted decision requiring careful consideration of various factors. A well-defined compensation strategy should be fair, sustainable, and aligned with the business’s goals and the entrepreneur’s contributions. Seeking professional advice from legal and financial experts is highly recommended to ensure a sound and legally compliant approach.
————–
If you have any questions or would like to share your thoughts on the column, feel free to send an email to jca.bblueprint@gmail.com. Looking forward to connecting with you!