The state-run Development Bank of the Philippines (DBP), the country’s eight largest bank in terms of assets, signed a second partnership agreement with the Charoen Pokphand Foods Philippine Corp. (CPFPC), a subsidiary of Bangkok-based Charoen Pokphand Group for credit assistance on aquaculture projects. (Their first partnership was on poultry-related projects signed in July 2022.)

Their second agreement “is in support of the Department of Agriculture’s (DA) commitment to intensify the fishery sector by increasing the local shrimp production to 276,320 tons from 2023 to 2027”, as announced by DBP. The DBP would provide financing for working capital requirements, fixed assets acquisition, installation of other support facilities, pond development of post-harvest facilities.

CPFPC, known to operate vertically integrated agro-industrial and food businesses in 17 countries, also engages in the production, processing, and marketing of poultry products in partnership with integrated partners. (Its Thai parent firm is one of the largest producers of poultry and pork internationally.

The partnership covers a range of aquaculture-related activities supporting small and micro enterprises and cooperatives with a minimum funding of P15 million or up to 90 % of the total project cost, the partners reported. The agreement also covers medium-to-large enterprises with minimum funding of P15 million, or up to 70 percent of the total project cost.

MY COMMENT:
The second partnership between Thailand and the Philippines on aquaculture is welcomed and timely, especially for the Philippines which is facing food security problem. While fish production has been well augmented by the aquaculture sector, still one finds prices of quality fish species are still unaffordable by the ‘common tao’! Also, the agreement between DBP and the CPFPC is in line with President BBM’s goal “to improve agricultural production and ramp up modernization efforts of the sector.”
ooo000ooo
NEXT TOPIC : “LGUs receive P113 Billion Recovery Loan from Landbank”
SHARE S & T THOUGHTS through E-mail: drpacjr@yahoo.com.

Detained senator Leila De Lima opined that the world of then president Rodrigo “Digong” Roa Duterte (Duterte) and incumbent senator Ronald “Bato” de la Rosa (de la Rosa) is getting smaller. This, after the United Nation’s International Criminal Court (ICC) denied the motion filed by the aforenamed officials to bar the investigating team from proceeding with the probe of the bloody war on drugs. With the denial of the motion to halt the probe, there is no impediment for the ICC to prosecute the supposed culprits of that bloody drug war in the country.

But the Marcos administration through its Secretary of Justice (SOJ) Jesus Crispin “Boying” Remulla (Remulla) is hell bent to defend Duterte and de la Rosa by invoking the country’s sovereignty, arguing that the ICC has no right to interfere in our country’s internal affairs. He raises his own story that the administration’s justice system is working and there is no need for the ICC to interfere with our courts. He further claims that the justice department under his power is conducting investigation of the alleged bloody war on drugs.

Unfortunately, the tale of SOJ Remulla is a fallacious narrative if people would follow the actions done by the justice department insofar as the investigation of the war on drugs is concerned. Thus far, there are no clear results of such investigation and the claim that there would be findings on those involved in the war on drugs remains unseen. Of the reported over 7,742 victims of the war on drugs based on the Resource Library of the Armed Conflict and Location Data (ACLED), only two convictions had been won, chiefly on the strong relentless efforts of the victims’ families as well as religious and civil society groups.

With such outcome of SOJ’s Boying claimed investigation, the former ICC’s chief prosecutor Fatou Bensoda announced that there was “a reasonable basis to believe that the crime against humanity of murder” had been committed in the war on drugs carried out under the government of President Rodrigo Duterte. She further urged the ICC to open-up a full-scale investigation into the bloody crackdown between July 1, 2016 when he assumed office until March 16, 2019 when the Philippines’ withdrawal from the ICC took effect.

The investigation is set to proceed under ICC chief prosecutor Karim Asad Ahmed Khan KC, a British lawyer specializing in international criminal law and human rights law who has served as prosecutor of the ICC since 2023. The investigation had been labelled as an interference on our country’s internal affairs according to SOJ Remulla, adding that their coming into the country is not welcome and would result in a mess.

Peace loving people seeking justice would hope that the investigation will proceed to an acceptable conclusion and the justice department would not make it a mess.
comments to alellema@yahoo.com

The Philippine Qualifications Framework and Philippine Credit Transfer system is a glimmer of hope for the formal and non-formal education. It is a noble act of harmonizing the east and west of education and meeting them not separating. To me, this is not just noble but a practical approach and a way forward to attain greater access and answer the present and future needs of our systems.

Presently, the Commission on Higher Education is conducting a Regional Cascading evenyt of these noble undertaking.

The Philippine Qualifications Framework (PQF) is a quality-assured national system for the development, recognition, and award of qualifications based on standards of knowledge, skills, and values acquired in different ways and methods by learners and workers of the country1. It is governed by the PQF National Coordinating Council (PQF NCC) composed of the Department of Education (DepEd), Commission on Higher Education (CHED), Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA), Professional Regulations Commission (PRC), and Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE)1.

The PQF aims to establish national standards and levels of qualifications to assist and support academic and worker mobility and to address job-skills mismatch1. It outlines what an individual has learned and can do based on qualification type, levels, and degrees of competency1.

The Philippine Credit Transfer System is a mechanism that enables the transfer of credits between institutions, programs, or levels of education. It is designed to facilitate student mobility, lifelong learning, and the recognition of prior learning.

In a nutshell, these harmonizes the mandates of the CHED (Commission on Higher Education ), TESDA (Technical Education Skills and Development Authority ) and aligned their interests. Further, it gives them a common standards. This is a more than welcome development for all.

The advantages of the PQF and the Philippine Credit Transfer System include increased consistency of qualifications, transparency for employers, workers, teachers, learners, parents, and governments who wish to understand Philippine qualifications and compare them with others1. They also facilitate human capital development and skills mobility3. A successful framework increases the consistency of qualifications, provides transparency for employers, workers, teachers, learners, parents, and governments who wish to understand Philippine qualifications and compare them with others3 (pqf.gov.ph)
It is hoped that this Synergy will propel our educational system, forward!