Since the ratification of the 1987 Constitution, congress has yet to enact an enabling law prohibiting political dynasties. The utter failure to pass such legislation is due to the lack of interest of legislators as they will be the most affected. We know too well how politicians had maintained a stranglehold of elective positions and power with family and kin partaking the limited posts available. Such practice results in the concentration of political power within and among family members.
It deprives others of the opportunity to obtain elective office as the same are held exclusively beyond the reach and access of citizens who too are qualified to hold such offices. Incumbents and those in power have the edge in getting the position they presently hold. The tremendous force being wielded by the one in power who has at his disposal all necessary resources to ensure victory for him and every body in the family who are seeking elective office as well.
But we have been into such iniquitous situation ever since the provision against political dynasties was enshrined in the Constitution. The provision is well intended to equalize the playing field insofar as access to public office is made available to the citizenry. The idea may have been inspired by the bad experience during the two-decade Marcos rule where political power were concentrated on individuals who are blessed to be so by the powers that be. Many local officials then had served office as long or even beyond the two-decade dictatorship of the ousted despot. These officials stayed in power for as long as they willed to the deprivation of other citizens who also want to serve the office being held. The only result of this bad experience was the inclusion of a provision on term limits in the Constitution and the Local Government Code.
Dynasty according to one legal luminary, former Comelec Chairman Christian Monsod, who was one of the framers of the 1987 Constitution, is committed in two ways. It may be simultaneous or successive. The more prevalent practice is successive dynasty wherein the elected post is passed among family members in succession after the end of the term limit.
Such practice deprives all others aspiring for the post from getting the office as the incumbent has always the decided advantage for wielding power and resources to ensure keeping the post. In the other mode, family members seek elective office simultaneously and acquire control over positions of power. This is the case of the senatorial bets of the opposition who are being charged for building dynasties. But we have one unique case in point of both modes in the election bid of Alfred Romualdez who is bent on succeeding his father as mayor of Tacloban while his wife running simultaneously for a seat in the city council. But there is no enabling law prohibiting dynasties.
comments to alellema@yahoo.com
The first phone call, ever
By 1875, Alexander Graham Bell, with the help of his partner Thomas Watson, had come up with a simple receiver that could turn electricity into sound.
Other scientists, including Antonio Meucci and Elisha Gray, were working on similar technologies, and there’s some debate over who should be credited with the invention of the telephone. It’s said that Bell raced to the patent office to be the first to secure the rights to the discovery.
On March 7, 1876, Bell was granted his telephone patent. A few days later, he made the first-ever telephone call to Watson, allegedly uttering the now-famous phrase, “Mr. Watson, come here. I want you.”
It was just that and now , we are witnessing and using the revolutionary impact of the Smart Phone . Smartphones have significantly revolutionized our lives in various ways:
1. Connectivity: Easier to stay in touch with people globally.
2. Access to Information: Instant access to vast information online.
3. Convenience: Multiple functionalities in one device (navigation, shopping, banking, etc.).
4. Entertainment: Streaming movies, playing games, listening to music, and more.
5. Productivity: Apps that help us stay organized and efficient.
6. Health and Fitness: Track physical activity, sleep, and health metrics.
7. Photography: Powerful cameras for capturing and sharing moments.
8. Economic Impact: New job opportunities and mobile commerce.
But it all started small, crude and even without much hope. The inventor Mr. Bell surely has no inkling that more than a hundred years in the future the phone would be the most important thingy for all mankind.
Research indicates that smartphones can significantly impact social behavior and relationships, with men potentially experiencing stronger social disconnect compared to women. Excessive smartphone use may lead to behavioral addiction, such as social media or gaming addiction, negatively affecting mental health by causing depression and anxiety.
Mobile phone distraction can also reduce psychological well-being and attention control. Studies highlight gender differences, suggesting that men might face more substantial emotional challenges due to smartphone use, underlining the importance of balanced digital interactions and maintaining real-life connections to mitigate these effects.
In all, phones have advanced exponentially from that first call, now who knows what will happen to the future with the Smart Phone in it?