IN the gospel, we can hear Christ declaring himself as the door of the sheepfold. (cfr. Jn 10,7-9) “I am the door,” he said. “By me, if any man enters in, he shall be saved, and shall go in, and go out, and shall find pastures.”
With these words, we are made to understand that he is the sole legitimate entrance to human salvation, the protector who safeguards the sheep (us) from harm, contrasting himself from false leaders and prophets who would only exploit the flock.
In other words, he depicts himself as the only and unique mediator, as articulated once by St. Paul when he said: “There is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.” (1 Tim 2,5) In short, his salvific mission and mediation have a universal scope, and not just meant for some people.
In this regard, we can cite some points from a Vatican document, issued way back in 2000, entitled “Dominus Iesus, on the Unicity and Salvific Universality of Jesus Christ and the Church.” It responded and clarified certain theological trends that denied Christ’s exclusive mediation and proposed alternative and complementary revelations.
It’s definitely a delicate topic that has to be studied well and thoroughly. But first of all, it has to be studied in a way that is always guided by faith and not just by pure human reason that can present all kinds of theories, hypotheses and assumptions.
Let’s remember that the ultimate proof of the credibility of our Christian faith is the fact that Christ who is regarded as the fullness of revelation can truly be regarded as God because among the many good things he did, he finally resurrected from the dead.
Christ’s resurrection is the pivotal event that validates his claims about his divinity. It shows his power over death and the fulfillment of the prophecies that showed his relationship with God—that he is not just a man, a very special man, but first of all, he is God, the son of God who became man for our salvation.
We need to constantly strengthen this belief especially nowadays when there are many elements that tend to distract and weaken our belief in Christ. There even are open efforts to present an alternative to Christ.
We need to do everything to make Christ the constant focus and center of our life. May everything that we do, from our thoughts and desires to our words and deeds, begin with Christ as the inspiration, continue with Christ as our main help, and reach its target with Christ as the goal himself.
Let’s convince ourselves that any way of being and acting that is outside of this loop would expose us to deadly moral and spiritual dangers. Thus, right from the beginning of the day, as when we wake up, the first thing that should come to mind is regain this awareness that we need Christ always.
And so, we should develop the practice of making a morning offering to Christ of everything that will take place on that day as soon as we get up from bed in the morning. It’s what saints and many other people have been doing to set the proper human and supernatural tone to their daily affairs, giving them a sense of direction and purpose for the day.
The effort to give the first thought of the day to Christ is all worthwhile since it corresponds to the fundamental reality that our life is always, from beginning to end, a shared life with Christ and therefore also with God the Father, Creator, and God the Holy Spirit, the Sanctifier. Christ should be our all! (cfr. Col 3,11)
Surviving displacements
In 2023, Hollywood writers walked out and shut down production lines, not only over pay but over the creeping use of AI in scriptwriting. That moment felt less like a labor dispute and more like a warning flare. I take it as a hard truth: the age of stable, predictable work is slipping, and ordinary workers cannot afford to wait politely for it to return.
I have stopped believing that jobs, as we knew them, will “come back.” Machines do not get tired, do not ask for overtime, and do not organize unions. That is not bitterness—it is arithmetic. When a company can automate a task more cheaply and quickly, it will. I see it in supermarkets replacing cashiers with self-checkout, in banks closing counters, and in offices where one software now does the work of three clerks. The polite advice to “just work harder” sounds almost insulting now, like telling a fisherman to row faster after the fish have already migrated.
So, what should ordinary workers do? First, we have to abandon the old romance of a single lifelong job. That story is over. I say this not with despair but with a certain clarity I wish I had earlier. Work now behaves like weather—changing, sometimes harsh, sometimes generous, rarely predictable. Waiting for stability is like waiting for the wind to stop. It won’t. The wiser move is to learn how to adjust your sails, even if you never wanted to be a sailor in the first place.
That adjustment begins with learning—not the glossy, expensive kind sold in motivational seminars, but the practical, almost stubborn kind. I’m talking about skills that machines still struggle with: judgment, taste, persuasion, and care. A robot can generate a report, but it cannot sit across a grieving client and choose the right silence. It can analyze data, but it cannot read a room the way a seasoned teacher or a street vendor can. These are not soft skills; they are survival skills now. And they are learned not in grand leaps but in small, deliberate steps—one course, one practice, one awkward attempt at something new.
At the same time, I think we must be honest: not everyone can or should become a coder or a tech specialist. That advice has been repeated so often that it has turned into noise. What I find more realistic is diversification—having more than one way to earn. A side hustle is no longer a hobby; it is a second leg to stand on. I’ve met people who sell food online after office hours, teachers who tutor privately, and drivers who manage small digital shops. It is not glamorous. It is, however, practical. And practicality has a quiet dignity that flashy success stories often lack.
There is also something we rarely admit: dignity in work must be redefined. For too long, we tied our worth to job titles and office desks. But when machines begin to take those away, we are forced to ask uncomfortable questions. Am I my job, or am I something more stubborn than that? I lean toward the latter. I’ve seen janitors who carry themselves with more pride than executives, and freelancers who earn less but live more freely. If AI strips away illusions, perhaps that is one strange gift it offers—to separate identity from employment.
Still, I do not think adaptation should fall entirely on workers. There is a quiet anger in me when I see corporations racing toward automation while offering little protection to those displaced. Governments and institutions must step in—not with empty slogans, but with real programs: retraining that actually leads to jobs, safety nets that do not humiliate, policies that recognize this shift as structural, not temporary. Without that, we are asking individuals to fight a tidal wave with bare hands.
As these things unfold, I keep returning to a simple, almost stubborn idea: do not freeze. The worst response to this moment is paralysis—the quiet surrender of waiting for things to go back to how they were. They won’t. I would rather move, even clumsily, than stand still with perfect understanding. Learn something, try something, fail at something, and earn a little from somewhere unexpected. It may not look like the old dream, but it might still be a life—imperfect, improvised, but unmistakably ours.