Information regarding the closure of the iconic San Juanico Bridge to huge and heavy vehicles over 3 tons in weight is simply mindboggling. The sudden closure and ban to heavy vehicles came as a surprise to travelers who had never been informed prior to such closure. Many travelers were stranded at both ends of the bridge as there was confusion where to go to any alternate route. It took several days before concerned officials thought of the old Amandayehan port that was used some years back when the bridge was rehabilitated. Unfortunately, said port was not ready for docking and passage of heavy loads as it was found needing major repair.
What keeps government officials from sharing and disclosing vital information to the public regarding nagging questions about the damage of the San Juanico Bridge that until the time the information remains unclear, chiefly on the structural findings of the consultant.
The photos shared to the public showing rust and corrosion are superficial images that do not describe the strength of the damage of the piers, girders, trusses and gusset plates shown in the pictures. There too were no underwater images and videos showing the damaged foundations. All these information if shared to the media and the public would dispel all doubts regarding what appears to be a progressive cost and timeline for the complete retrofitting of the bridge.
This writer had been asking for a detailed information regarding the findings as to the structural damage, the detailed cost estimate as well as the original load design of the bridge that would explain why the sudden goal to restore the bearing capacity of the bridge to 12 tons. The original load design that the public works and highways department is now aiming to restore is reportedly the 33 tons original bearing capacity. Increasing the bearing capacity to more than 10 times the 3 tons limit that the said agency imposed when it closed the bridge due to the reported damage is certainly too costly.
People could not be blamed if they entertain doubts as to the continuing increase of the cost that the repair of the bridge would reportedly require. There too are suggestions from various sectors to have the original contractor that constructed the bridge be tapped to undertake the repair. The public would be interested if the repair would be made transparent considering that it is taxpayers’ money that is used to finance the repair. Some people believe that the original builder has the expertise and experience than any other. But we could not discount the capability of other contractors who may have advanced equipment and technology to do the job. All that the public needs is transparency so that they can participate in checking the repair works.
The unclear aspects of the repair had caused even the city chief executive who is not bothered with the foul and stinky odor that the unclear sea water along the seawall and fish port area emit, smell something fishy about the bridge repair that seems a work in increasing cost. It really needs more that meets the eye to seen through what remains murky.
comments to alellema@yahoo.com
Let the people judge
It is one thing to show the world evidence, file legal cases, and let the process run without hindrance. But when political rivals are igniting torches and sharpening blades, the hunt is no longer justice, but theatre. It becomes barefacedly clear that the purpose is neither truth nor accountability, but extermination. This is the time-tested anatomy of political destruction—where power is exercised not to construct a nation, but to dismantle opposition power. In so doing, we start to decay from the inside out, as democracy is reduced to a shootout of whoever is most popular, sponsored by those who do not want to lose their crowns.
It is not merely the Dutertes and the Marcoses. It is about a perilous phenomenon in Philippine politics wherein public stance is a conflict of opposing clans, with the people just pawns instead of being the final authorities. The harm goes beyond headlines—it infects our national conscience, anesthetizing us to the loss of faith in our institutions. When politicians are more concerned with making points than with serving their constituents, public trust breaks like an eggshell crushed by the heel of a heavy boot. And we know that once broken, trust rarely comes back to its former strength.
Even the greatest institutions can be no greater than those who occupy them. When prosecutors are made puppets, when courts curtsy at the mention of a palace’s caprice, and when threats of impeachment are used like fishhooks before the unsuspecting, then we are no longer ruled by law, but by drama. And a heartless drama at that—where actors wear masks of virtue, but conceal daggers behind them. The voters, meanwhile, sit on the sidelines, silenced and forced to cheer or jeer on somebody else’s command.
Let us not act like this is something novel. Power politics masquerading as policy have been a staple of Philippine politics for a long time. Politicians here love to clothe their scores with legal garb and pretend it’s for the people. But beneath that barbed Tagalog and sanctimonious talk are fragile egos concealed in barbed ambition. What we see happening today is but a brasher incarnation of an ancient game—an ancient game that belittles the wisdom of a people wiser than the elites would have them believe.
And when politicians change overnight—from defender to guardian, from foe to friend—simply on the strength of votes gained in an election, it is a guarantee of what everyone is sure of: that values can be discarded, that moral positions are for sale. This is a mockery not only of democratic processes, but of leadership itself. If their leaders are not constant in what they think, if they dance to the beat of power rather than march to the drumbeat of justice, how could they possibly be entrusted with the future of a nation?
The citizens are not a naive crowd for elites to inform them as to whether a person is correct or incorrect. The electors are forgiving, but not idiots. They spot hypocrisy even when it’s shrouded in legalese or trumpeted publicly in self-serving press conferences. All that they need is to form their own opinions. Take that from them, and you create their disillusionment—and eventually, their revolt. That is how institutions crumble: not in a blast, but in a gradual, incremental drift away from the people that they are meant to serve.
Perhaps the better way is to trust in the people, not the politicians. Let the courts function, for sure—but let them function without the shadow of political vendetta hanging over them. And above all, let the voters do what the system exists for: elect the destiny of leaders, not through choreographed knockouts, but through the ballot box. Because true change—true, enduring, and meritorious—does not come out of adversaries breaking each other. It comes from the people making sound decisions and being allowed to do so freely.