For so long we have been harboring the wrong notion that Catholics do not use the bible. If we see people roaming around carrying bibles, we can be sure they are not Catholics. The practice is still true in this era and generation, for Catholics are not even required to own a bible. While other sects are using the bible in their activities, Catholics do not as they are just made to listen to the Word of God during Holy Masses. The faithful are not obliged to carry the Holy Bible during liturgies. Studying the Word of God is not part of the liturgy unlike other sects where bible reading is done as part of their activities
While young Catholic kids are made to attend Catechism before receiving first communion, other sects expose their kids to the bible based on their misconstrued explanation of the faith. We adhere to the teaching authority of the Catholic Church and do not delve studying the bible on our own personal interpretation. Other sects are too assuming in making private interpretations and teaching the word of God to their followers without consulting the Church majesterium as to how bible is to be reflected on and understood.
It is precisely the wrong practice of reading the Bible and delving into private interpretations that do not conform to the teaching of the Catholic Church that was built and established by Jesus Christ that had caused the proliferation of many sects. The Church which Jesus Christ entrusted to Peter had been given the authority to teach the faith when the apostles were commanded to go and preach the good news. No one of the apostles was told to write the teachings. This is why the Holy Bible came much later as a compilation of product of the discernment of the Catholic Church. It was compiled from manuscripts that were scattered in different places and times.
Sects that make the Holy Bible the fundamental source of their faith and teaching are lost in their chosen path. The fundamental truth that these non-Catholic sects miss or just refuse to recognize is that the Catholic Church was established by Jesus Christ long before the Holy Bible was completed. This means that the Catholic Church had already been preaching the Good News immediately when the apostles received the command to preach which was too long before the Holy Bible came into being.
Knowing the bible is knowing Christ. This is why people has to read the bible, or for those who cannot read, listen to the readings. The Catholic Church that compiled all the sacred writings into books, chapters and verses had set the daily readings for a three-year cycle. Attending masses daily and listening to the readings is tantamount to have read the entire bible. One does not read it selectively and not in its entirety, otherwise, it would result to personal misinterpretation.
In doing our personal reading, we only have to reflect the word of God and how it touches our daily life. We should refrain from making personal interpretations as we have no training on hermeneutics like our Catholic priests. We encounter many people who try reading and interpreting the bible and they sound like false preachers.
comments to alellema@yahoo.com
Searching for the uncivilized
In our modern world, where globalization and cultural exchange abound, understanding and appreciating diversity have become essential. Amidst this context, the search for remnants of uncivilized minorities raises intriguing questions about cultural survival, adaptation, and assimilation. What are the complexities of this search, paying particular attention to how these remnants challenge the traditional concept of civilization?
Before embarking on the topic, it is crucial to establish a nuanced understanding of “uncivilized minorities.” Such groups are often marginalized societies, often indigenous or descendants of indigenous peoples, who maintain cultural practices that are distinct from the dominant group or society. I don’t know if we still have many of them in our country, perhaps in Mindanao or even Samar. The term ‘uncivilized’ is laden with historical ethnocentric baggage, which should be approached with sensitivity and critical analysis. Let’s view ‘uncivilized’ merely as a historical construct, acknowledging that this terminology cannot be used to universally classify entire communities or individuals.
The search for remnants of uncivilized minorities can be rooted in the discipline of anthropology, which has historically aimed to study and comprehend diverse cultures. Anthropologists play a significant role in initiatives that explore and critically examine cultural diversity, with an emphasis on preserving cultural heritage. By documenting the customs, traditions, and rituals of these minority groups, anthropologists contribute to the collective knowledge and appreciation of human civilization.
One must acknowledge that cultures are not stagnant, but rather fluid entities that evolve and adapt over time. The remnants of uncivilized minorities often raise intriguing questions about cultural survival and adaptation. Maintaining certain aspects of traditional practices amid a rapidly changing world allows these communities to preserve their unique identity. However, the complex interplay between preservation and assimilation poses challenges for these groups, as they must navigate the impact of globalization, modernization, and external forces on their cultural practices.
Anthropological ethnography plays a crucial role in understanding and documenting the remnants of uncivilized minorities. Through conducting immersive fieldwork, ethnographers employ various research methods to explore the lives and practices of these marginalized groups. By observing, interviewing, and participating in the daily lives of community members, anthropologists elucidate the intricate landscape of cultural identity and contribute to the broader understanding of human diversity.
The concept of civilization itself needs to be critically evaluated when searching for remnants of uncivilized minorities. Often, the dominant society associates civilization with progress, technological advancements, and socioeconomic development. However, within this search, the remnants challenge this preconceived notion, forcing us to question what constitutes civilization. By recognizing alternative ways of life as equally legitimate and valuable, we widen our perspective on human existence and contribute to a more inclusive understanding of civilization.
Examining the remnants of uncivilized minorities requires vigilance in navigating ethical considerations. It is vital to approach the subject matter respectfully, avoiding misinterpretation or exploitation. Working together with these communities, researchers and policymakers should foster cultural preservation initiatives that protect the practices and knowledge crucial to these groups’ identity. Collaboration, mutual respect, and co-production of knowledge are key to preserving cultural diversity while ensuring the empowerment and self-determination of marginalized communities.